ENDNOTES

102. Natural and Cultural Resource Management Plan and Environmental Assessment, 1986, op. cit., p. 96.

103. Memorandum to the Superintendent, Crater Lake National Park, Daniel J. Tobin, Regional Director, Pacific Northwest Region, December 16, 1981, in Historic Structure Report: Crater Lake Lodge, op. cit., pp. 576-577.

104. “Status Report, Crater Lake National Park, Package 220, Lodge Rehabilitation,” February 14, 1983, History Files, Crater Lake National Park. Portland Oregonian, April 26, 1983.

105. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Winter use Study, Crater Lake National Park Oregon [1980], Files, Pacific Northwest Regional Office, Seattle, and “Analysis of Feasibility of Year-Round Lodging, Demand, and Cost Effectiveness for Concessioner Operation,” supplement to the 1982 Market Study, Files, Technical Information Center, Denver Service Center. It should be brought out that questions remain about the wisdom of basing a multi-million dollar development on these studies, neither of which had a scope to adequately access a new hotel’s commercial viability at Rim Village, let alone its social or environmental impact. (Conversation with DSC Concessions Analyst Russell Pishnery, September 8,1989).

106. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Planning Process Guideline, July 1978, chapter 7, p. 12.

107. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Environmental Assessment. Development Concept Plan, Amendment to the General Management Plan Crater Lake National Park, February 1984.

108. “Crater Lake Lodge, A Total Rehabilitation Scenario, Combined Option,” op. cit., p. 5.

109. Alfred Staehli, Oregon AlA State Preservation Coordinator, to Daniel J. Tobin, Jr., Regional Director, Pacific Northwest RegIon, March 23, 1984, and Robert Fink, Acting Chief, Western Division of Project Review, Advisory Council On Historic Preservation, to Daniel J. Tobin, Jr., Regional Director, Pacific Northwest Region, April 10, 1984, Interpretation Division Files, Crater Lake National Park.

110. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Environmental Assessment, Development Concept Plan, Amendment to the General Management Plan, Crater Lake National Park. February, 1984, pp. 67-68.

111. “Crater Lake Lodge, A Total Rehabilitation Scenario, Combined Option,” op. cit., p. 5.

112. Medford Mail Tribune, July 29, 1984, p. 18C, and Portland Oregonian, August 28, 1984.

113. Weaver to Dickenson, August 27, 1984, p. 2, Interpretation Division Files, Crater Lake National Park, and Klamath Falls Herald and News, September 12, 1984, p. 2.

114. Portland Oregonian, September 17, 1984, and Klamath Falls Herald and News, September 17, 1984, p. 2.

115. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Interim Development Concept Plan Amendment to the General Management Plan, Crater Lake National Park Oregon, April, 1985.

116. “Report on Crater Lake Lodge to the House of Representatives, Subcommittees on Public Lands and National Parks, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs,” March 1986, p. 1, in volume one of Technical Analysis Report for Rehabilitation, Crater Lake Lodge, Crater Lake National Park by Broome, Oringdulph, O’Toole, Rudolf, Boles and Associates, P.C., Architects, et al., Files, Technical Information Center, Denver Service Center.

117. Alfred Staehli, Historic Structures Maintenance Guide, [Mount Rainier National Park], NPS Pacific Northwest Region, Cultural Resources Division (Seattle, 1983), 73 p.