Businesses could fall if freeway exit is realigned: Fixup of
Highway 62 depends on I-5 changes
Mail Tribune
Medford, Oregon
July 25, 2000
By DANI DODGE
Three businesses will be bulldozed and others will lose their
access to Highway 62 if the Oregon Department of
Transportation’s proposed realignment of the north Medford
Interstate 5 interchange is approved.
"It’s virtually impossible not to have some impact on businesses
if we are to improve the transportation situation," said Gary
Shaff, senior planner for JRH transportation engineering of
Medford, the Highway 62 traffic engineers. "In an urban area,
it’s just the reality."
For safety and economic reasons, the state already has
designated Highway 62 — from Delta Waters Road to Highway 140 —
as an expressway: a piece of road that has few, if any, private
driveways.
Highway 62 is considered one of the most important roadways in
the Rogue Valley as a link between Medford and White City, a
route to Central and Eastern Oregon, and a gateway to Crater
Lake National Park.
The Oregon Department of Transportation is considering several
options for realigning the stretch of Highway 62 from I-5 to
White City. It could follow its current route; it could take new
route loosely based on the old Haul Road right-of-way; or it
could end up being a combination of the two.
All of these alternatives, though, depend on one crucial
element: the realignment of the I-5 interchange at Highway 62.
The interchange is so congested and gnarled that vehicles often
back up onto the freeway. Congress appropriated more than $17
million for the $22 million interchange project, and the state
is throwing in the rest.
After looking at 50 scenarios, engineers have come up with an
interchange design that will connect into any of the
alternatives for the larger project and has the least impact on
existing businesses. But the plan does change the access of many
businesses on Highway 62.
It also puts roads through current businesses: the International
House of Pancakes, Denny’s and Best Western Pony Soldier.
Business and property owners are reacting with everything from
bitter resignation to hopes for a better future.
"What can you do?" asked one property owner who declined to be
identified. "They will take it no matter how you feel. There’s
not anything you can do about it."
At IHOP, manager Betsy Bigham was worried about the regulars
like the couple who eat breakfast there every day and the little
old man who comes in every Sunday for his strawberry waffles.
But, she said, she hopes the corporate office and restaurant
owner will relocate the pancake and dinner house to an
easier-to-reach location, like maybe the Central Point
Interstate 5 exit.
"We have a terrible location here," she admitted. "Hopefully,
this will be positive and not negative."
Johnnie Roach, a friend of Best Western Pony Soldier owner Mary
Martha McComas, said she has a 22-year lease on the property.
They are exploring both the pros and the cons of the situation.
"The cons are we are out of business and there is no 22 years of
income left," Roach said. "It’s a matter of the state doing
their calculations and coming up with an offer. You never know
until you get to the table."
Bill Siebert, who co-owns the land on which Best Western and
Denny’s sit, said he remembers that stretch of road when he
first came to the Rogue Valley in 1943 and lived at Camp White.
"It was a great deal different than what is like now," he said.
"There wasn’t any Interstate 5. There was hardly any buildup on
Crater Lake Highway. It was just farmland."
But he said he’s not going to let himself get worked up about
the changes.
"I’m surprised they are going that way and spending that much
money for all these properties," he said. "But as long as you
get compensated for the property, it’s not too much problem."
ODOT’s Frank Stevens, the leader of the Highway 62 project, said
negotiations with land and business owners are part of the
process. He noted that ODOT even pays relocation costs.
"They won’t be left out in the cold," he said. "We are typically
successful in negotiations, and the process is there if we can’t
come to a resolution.
"And then the courts can decide. ... But that’s the last
resort."
There’s still a chance that the project won’t go forward. ODOT
has scheduled a hearing on a draft environmental impact
statement in early 2001. That hearing will explore the economic
and environmental impacts of the three alternatives. The
alternatives all include the same interchange design, but a
fourth option is to build nothing. If one of the "build"
alternatives is approved, construction of the new interchange
will begin in the summer of 2003. Construction of the rest of
the Highway 62 plan will occur when funding becomes available.
"The implications of no-build are the congestion will get worse,
air quality will be degraded and accidents will increase and
possibly, you could develop to the point that there would be
fewer jobs," said Jim Hanks, project manager of JRH
transportation engineering. "The problems identified in that
corridor are pretty substantial and very real."