48 Volume 26 – 1995

The Fretful Porcupine

By Marianne Mills

Measuring up to 2.5 feet in length and weighing thirty pounds, the North American porcupine, Erethizon dorsatum, is one of the world’s largest rodents. Fossils of porcupine ancestors date back to the Oligocene epoch, about 30 million years ago. It is believed that porcupines originated in South America and are most closely related to the guinea pig and the chinchilla. While porcupines may not be considered great beauties of the natural world, they have proven themselves to be masters of survival. Naturalist Uldis Roze describes them as “a microcosm in the great evolutionary adventure of nature.”

Dark in color, they have a somewhat “frosted” appearance because their quills are yellow to white with a black tip. An average of 30,000 quills grow only on their backs, sides, and tails. These modified hairs have tiny scales like a fish, with each scale acting like a tiny barb on a fish hook. It is these scales that hold a quill tightly in a predator’s skin. Folklore describes a creature that is quick to fire quills at enemies. In truth, it slaps its victims with its tail only in self-defense and does not have the ability to project its quills, no matter how frightened. Muscle action combines with these scales to work the quills deeper and deeper into the unfortunate’s body, becoming very painful. If a vital organ is struck, they can be fatal. A misconception is that a quill will shrink if the end is cut off, making it easier to pull out. The quills are filled with a spongy material, not air, so they do not shrink or soften.

The range of porcupines covers most of the western United States. Their preferred habitat is dense forest, making Crater Lake National Park suitable for a healthy porcupine population. Slow and somewhat awkward, these nocturnal creatures are more graceful in trees than on the ground. They always climb up head first, but will back down a tree tail first. Much of their time is spent in a den which is usually a small cave or deep crevice in a ledge or rock pile, a large hollow in a tree trunk a hollow under a partially uprooted tree, or an abandoned animal burrow. In very cold weather or deep snow, porcupines sometimes stay in their dens for two to three days at a time. Solitary during most of the year, porcupines may band together to share a den and their communal heat. If a porcupine is seen out of its den in winter, it is most likely there to feed, then return to warmth. Possessing some of the poorest eyesight among all mammals, a typical porcupine can see only two to five feet in the distance. Poor vision is offset by excellent senses of smell and hearing. Porcupines vocalize; if disturbed, they may squeak, grumble, groan, or seem to mutter to themselves. They can also emit a high-pitched cry that people have mistaken for a bobcat or mountain lion.

Most often found between 5,000 and 6,500 feet in elevation, porcupines are strict vegetarians. Their favorite food is the inner bark of trees, though they tend to feed on young trees that would most likely be naturally shinned out. They also like leaves, certain grasses, berries, and fruits such as apples. They possess an insatiable love of salt, something which causes them to frequently loiter around highways which get salted during winter. This can lead to the death of many porcupines through being struck by vehicles. Porcupines are also drawn to objects that people have handled so as to lick the salty sweat left behind. Their search for sodium can thereby bring about the destruction of objects such as handrails, steps, and doorways.

Porcupines are somewhat different than most mammals in that the females stake out a territory and fight to protect it, rather than the males. A female porcupine has just one offspring per year and will raise it alone. Baby porcupines are called porcupettes and are comparatively large, being about one pound at birth. They are born with open eyes and soft quills, with the latter hardening within the first ten minutes after delivery. Porcupettes will travel long distances on their own almost immediately, but they do not climb trees for several months. The young porcupettes travel with their mother during night feeding sessions for three to four months when they become independent.

When thinking of the great animals of literature, seldom does the porcupine come to mind. The title of this article is taken from Act I, Scene V of Hamlet and reminds us that all creatures have a place in art, as well as science: “I could a tale unfold whose lightest word Would harrow up thy soul . . . Like quills upon the fretful porpentine { sic } . ” A naturalist must also exhibit duality, or lives in two worlds: the world of nature and the world of human ideas. One world is represented by a fallen tree; the other by a library. Each species studied, each theory formed brings the two worlds a bit closer together. We learn through the survivors and speculate on species that have become extinct. The porcupine thus becomes a storyteller of the woods. In its telling, its frets are fewer and its ancient story more eloquent.

Further Information
Uldis Roze, The North American Porcupine. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1989.

Marianne Mills was the assistant chief of interpretation at Crater Lake until May 1995, when she transferred to Badlands National Park.

Mimicry Among the Pines?

By Ron and Joy Mastrogiuseppe

The deep blue of Crater Lake is enhanced by the verdure of the coniferous forest around it. Splashes of green unite in harmony with multicolored volcanic bluffs in the caldera landscape. Distance masks the variety of species in these green areas. There is a certain pleasure in recognizing species by name, but even with a close view, walking among the noble conifers, there are striking similarities in the appearance of different members of a genus such as Abies, the true firs.

Sometimes these similarities obscure their differences. Such difficulty in distinguishing species is more challenging if seed cones are unavailable at the time identification is made. Since seed cones of the true firs disintegrate at maturity, features such as cone shape, cone scales, bracts, and seeds may not be available for inspection. This lack of essential diagnostic features can frustrate a desire to classify and distinguish a species by name.

Even when the important diagnostic features are present, species distinction may be confusing at times. In the late 1970s it was reported that Jeffrey pine, Pinus jeffreyi,occurs in the forested panhandle of Crater Lake National Park. The most northerly known natural populations of this tree occur, however, on serpentine substrates near the Illinois Valley southwest of Grants Pass. The biologists reporting Jeffrey pine in the panhandle (some 100 miles northeast of those Illinois Valley populations) based their determination primarily on seed cones which did not appear like cones of typical ponderosa pine, P. ponderosa. Apparently those biologists were unaware of another contender, P. washoensis, a rare pine similar to ponderosa but with smaller cones. As it turned out, the ponderosa variants in the panhandle are actually closer to Washoe pine than to Jeffrey pine based on cone length and diameter. There still is the need, however, for additional study of local populations as one part toward understanding variation on a larger geographic scale because the widely-distributed variants of ponderosa pine are so difficult to interpret.

If we shift our attention from three-needled pines to members of the genus whose needles are borne in clusters of five, each life zone (a concept which largely corresponds to elevation in this part of the Cascade Range) within Crater Lake National Park may be characterized by a different species. Sugar pine, P. lambertiana, of the mixed conifer forest bears foliage which resembles that of western white pine, P. monticola, which typically grows in association with more high elevation true firs such as red and noble fir within the A. magnifica/procera complex. When sugar pine and western white pine occur in overlapping habitats, younger trees of both species look alike. We can also find species very distinct taxonomically but adapted to similar habitats and displaying an amazing degree of similarity in a number of characteristics during each life stage. For example, whitebark pine, P. albicaulis, of the upper caldera rim area is strikingly similar to limber pine, P. flexilis. Although limber pine is absent at Crater Lake today, it typically occurs in subalpine habitats in the northern Rocky Mountains, much of the Great Basin, and the eastern Sierra Nevada, where there are some areas that whitebark and limber pine grow together. Strangely enough, limber pine is Oregon’s rarest conifer, with the state’s only known populations occurring in the Wallowa Mountains some 300 miles northeast of the park.

In asserting that many species look much alike, we may wonder what is a species? It is generally regarded as a group of similar individuals which are reproductively isolated from other groups. Although members of a species share many characteristics, variation is inherent. Hidden within the forest canopy are many seed cones nurturing potential trees. Formed through the genetic mystery of reproduction, the seeds bear an awesome responsibility in perpetuating their kind in all its variation. In conifers, the messenger of similarity and difference becomes the wind as it carries vast quantities of pollen to receptive young cones. Differences in timing of pollen release and of conelet receptivity act as barriers to cross-pollination between different species.

Recognition of species is not only rewarding, but also crucial to understanding interactions among trees, their physical environment, and the creatures that depend on the trees. Coevolution is the reciprocal evolution of two species, in that one species adapts to evolution in the other. If, for example, we have a specific insect and a plant on which it depends for food, an evolutionary change in the chemistry of the plant might make it less digestible by the insect species. Those individuals of the insect species which are still able to digest the plant tissues survive and reproduce. Thus the evolutionary change in the plant has led to an evolutionary change in the insect.

Sometimes coevolution or coadaptation results in mimicry. This is the close resemblance of one species to another, stemming from pressures acting to select for those individuals in the “mimicking” species which resemble the “mimicked” species. Mimicry may have various advantages to a species, including protection from predation, thereby favoring their survival. But is this the case in conifers? Pines are subject to predation by a multitude of herbivorous insects which, at least in some cases, identify pine species based on the unique chemistry of their resins. It is unknown at present if there are any cases where resins of one conifer species have, over time, come to include a certain compound or compounds which cause insects to avoid another species. This would happen through the chance occurrence of the compounds in individuals which would then be more likely to survive and reproduce.

In some cases, experts may be faced with perceived differences which do not justify separation into distinct species. This is the challenge facing the biosystematist in evaluating the degree of difference necessary to separate species. The classification of organisms necessarily includes some subjective evaluation because lumping all similar species into one group on some “objective” basis (thereby ignoring their interesting differences) would compromise our understanding of the species’ respective ecological roles and the limits of their environmental ranges. With the term “species diversity” becoming increasingly important in discourse about the biological conservation of organisms, it seems obvious that careful thinking and humility are needed when trying to assess ecological quandaries posed by forces difficult to quantify. Those who oversimplify and arrogantly generalize about our world do so at their peril, as Alexander Pope noted almost three centuries ago:

Go, wond ‘rous creature! mount where Science guides,
Go, measure earth, weigh air, and state the tides;
Instruct the planets in what orbs to run,
Correct old Time, and regulate the Sun;
Go, soar with Plato to th’ empyreal sphere,
To the first good, first perfect, and first fair;
Or tread the mazy round his follow ‘rs trod,
And quitting sense call imitating God;
As Eastern priests in giddy circles run,
And turn their heads to imitate the Sun.
Go, teach Eternal Wisdom how to rule –
Then drop into thyself, and be a fool!

Ron and Joy Mastrogiuseppe are former seasonal employees at Crater Lake. They are now based in Burns, Oregon, where he is an ecologist and she works as a botanist.


Amy Mark, NPS files.