Crater Lake Institute
 

 Home | Site Map | About Us | Donate/Join Us | Contact Us | CLI Store | Press Room

 
 
 You are here: Home > Online Library > Final GMP/EIS > Introduction
   

General Management Plan, Environmental Impact Statement, Crater Lake National Park, Klamath, Jackson, Douglas Counties, Oregon, 2005

 

Introduction

 

<< Previous | Table of Contents | Next >>

Crater Lake National Park was authorized by an act of Congress on May 22, 1902 (Public Law 32 Stat. 20). The last comprehensive management plan for the park was completed in 1977. Much has changed since 1977 — visitor use patterns and demographics have changed, there are new demands for various recreational experiences and activities, and 22,400 acres were added to the park. Each of these changes has implications for how visitors access and use the national park and the facilities needed to support those uses, how resources are managed, and how the National Park Service manages its operations. A new plan is needed.

This document examines four alternatives for managing the national park for the next 15 to 20 years. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. The “noaction” alternative, alternative 1 describes the existing conditions and trends of park management and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternatives. The emphasis of alternative 2 would be on increased opportunities in recreational diversity and resource education. Under alternative 3 visitors would experience a greater range of natural and cultural resources through recreational opportunities and education. The focus of alternative 4 would be on preservation and restoration of natural processes. Alternative 2 is the National Park Service’s preferred alternative.

Impacts resulting from the no- action alternative would be negligible to minor on natural resources, park operations, and concession operations, with no adverse impact on most cultural resources. Under alternative 2 there would generally be moderate to major beneficial impacts. Impacts from alternative 3 would be generally beneficial. Alternative 4 would offer moderate beneficial impacts to natural and cultural resources, with a moderate, adverse impact on visitor use.

For more information about this document, contact the Superintendent, Crater Lake National Park, P.O. Box 7, Hwy 62, Crater Lake, OR 97604, at (541) 594- 3002 or via email at CRLA_superintendent@nps.gov.

 

 

 

 

 Site Navigation

  Arts

  Crater Lake News

  Cultural History

  Natural History

  Online Library

     Books and Articles

        Browse all by Author

        Browse all by Title

        Cultural History

           General

           Historic Structures

           Native American

           Oral Histories

        Natural History

           Flora and Fauna

           General

        Park Management

           General

           Planning

        Research

           Atmosphere

           Fauna

           Fire

           Flora

           General

           Geology

           Limnology

           Visitation

     Nature Notes

     Images

     Maps

  Planning a Visit

  Research