Purpose of and Need for
the Plan
<<
Previous
|
Table of
Contents |
Next
>>
PURPOSE, NEED, AND SCOPING
PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose of this Final General Management
Plan / Environmental Impact Statement is to clearly define a direction for
resource preservation and visitor experience at Crater Lake National Park over
the next 15 to 20 years. The approved plan would provide a framework for
proactive decision- making, including decisions on visitor use, natural and
cultural resource management, park development, and addressing future
opportunities and problems.
This document will not describe how particular
programs or projects will be implemented or prioritized. Those decisions will be
deferred to more detailed implementation planning, which will follow the broad,
long- range decision making presented in this document.
The National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978
(PL 95- 625) requires the preparation and timely revision of general management
plans for each unit of the national park system. The previous Master Plan for
Crater Lake was approved in 1977. A number of subsequent planning efforts were
initiated, each undertaken to enhance the visitor experience and resource
protection at the developed areas of Crater Lake National Park. The park has
implemented significant portions of the plans for specific developed areas. For
example, Crater Lake Lodge has been rehabilitated and reopened in May 1995. A
new dormitory for concession employees has been built near Mazama Village. This
General Management Plan will provide an opportunity to consolidate these past
decisions that are spread throughout several documents into a single document.
The Final General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement takes a new
look at the management of the park based on the changes that have occurred since
1977 and current issues and concerns confronting the park, with the intent of
building on the park’s previous planning accomplishments. Visitor use patterns
and demographics have changed, there are new demands for recreational
experiences and activities, and 22,400 acres were added to the park. Each of
these changes has implications for how visitors access and use the national park
and the facilities needed to support those uses, how resources are managed, and
how the National Park Service manages its operations.