VI. Steps Leading Toward
Establishment of Crater Lake National Park
<<
Previous
|
Table of
Contents |
Next
>>
I. John Muir Assists the National
Park Concept
Following establishment of
Yellowstone Park in 1872, a period of eighteen years elapsed before any more
national parks were established. During this time a small group of
intellectuals, including scientists, naturalists, landscape architects,
arboriculturists, foresters, geologists, and a handful of editors of national
magazines, were refining the basic concepts of conservation. Through their
provocative writings and energetic leadership they made headway in reversing the
traditional American attitude toward the use and disposal of natural resources.
One particularly articulate and widely read spokesman for the national park idea
was John Muir, a well-educated Scotsman who in the 1870s acquired a love for the
mountains and forests of the Far West and who campaigned ceaselessly for
forty-five years in favor of the preservation of the wilderness and federal
control of forests. He was actively supported in these endeavors by the Sierra
Club, which he organized in 1892 and of which he served as president until 1914.
His chief concerns were the waste and destruction of forests by lumbermen,
cattle, and sheep.
[18]
Due considerably to Muir's
campaigning, three new parks were established in 1890: Yosemite, Sequoia, and
General Grant--all established to preserve the Sierra forests from timbering
excesses and overgrazing. Their bills slipped through Congress with few problems
and little fanfare. Monumentalism, combined with economic worthlessness, were
the predetermining factors leading to the establishment of all of them. As
Alfred Runte explains, "only where scenic nationalism did not conflict with
materialism could the national park idea further expand."
[19]
Despite this progress, valuable
public timber land continued to fall into the hands of large corporations and
timber speculators, primarily through provisions of the Timber Cutting and the
Timber and Stone acts of 1878, the former permitting citizens of certain western
states and territories to cut timber from public mineral lands free of charge
for mining and domestic purposes, and the latter providing for the sale to
citizens in certain western states of public lands valuable chiefly for timber
and stone. Both laws were abused, with the consequent loss of much valuable
timber land. The problem was aggravated in 1892 when the Timber and Stone Act
was extended to public land in all states, resulting in a loss from the public
forest domain of more than 13,500,000 acres of the most valuable timber property
in the United States.
[20]