ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
<<
Previous
|
Table of
Contents |
Next
>>
ALTERNATIVE B: RESURFACING, RESTORATION, AND
REHABILITATION
This section evaluates the potential impacts of alternative B.
Soundscapes and Noise
Traffic Noise
This alternative would not add traffic volume to the roadway corridor, and
changes to the horizontal or vertical alignments are slight. Therefore, the
noise environment would not change and would be similar to that described for
the no-action alternative.
Construction Noise
Since noise that radiates from construction equipment radiates equally in all
directions, the sound intensity would diminish inversely as the square of the
distance from the source. Therefore, in a free field (no reflections of sound),
the Lp decreases 6 decibel (dB) with each doubling of the distance from the
source. Under most conditions, reflected sound will reduce the attenuation due
to distance. Therefore, doubling the distance may only result in a decrease of 4
to 5 dB (Cowan 1994).
Table 6 provides estimated sound pressure levels at a distance of 50 feet for
miscellaneous heavy construction equipment.
Typical noise levels generated by these activities range from 75 to 89 dB at 50
feet from the source. At 100 feet from the source, noise levels would range from
69 dBA to 83 dBA. In the proposed wilderness area, noise levels would range from
63 to 77 dB at the wilderness boundary (200 feet), and vary by distance and
forest shielding along the trail.
|
TABLE 6. HEAVY EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVELS AT 50 FEET
|
|
Equipment Type
|
Number Used1 |
Generated Noise Levels, Lp(dB)2 |
| Bulldozer |
1 |
88 |
| Backhoe (rubber tire) |
1 |
80 |
| Front Loader (rubber tire) |
1 |
80 |
| Concrete Truck |
1 |
75 |
| Concrete Finisher |
1 |
80 |
| Asphalt Spreader |
1 |
80 |
| Roller |
1 |
80 |
| Scraper |
1 |
89 |
1 Estimated number in use at any time.
2 Source: CERL 1978.
The sensitive noise receptor (Pacific Crest Trail user) would experience a
substantial increase in noise levels (15 to 29 dB at 100 feet, and 9 to 23 dB at
the wilderness boundary). However, this impact would be very short in duration
(only when construction is occurring on the segment in close proximity to the
receptor) and affecting a small number of park visitors (less than 4% of park
visitors). Therefore, the impacts are expected to be minor to moderate, short
term, and adverse.
The other two noise sensitive receptors (the northern spotted owl activity
center and Annie Creek Canyon Trail) are more than 800 feet away (2,952 feet and
1,320 feet, respectively). At the evaluated distance of 800 feet, ambient noise
levels would be less than the 51 to 65 dBA estimated using the 6 dBA drop-off
with each doubling of distance, due to shielding by the forested woodlands, and
would likely approach, or be negligible above existing levels. The existing
noise environment includes a negligible amount of daily traffic volume, with no
additional noise sources other than the natural soundscape. Construction noise
would occur during daytime hours during the summer months, and is not expected
to be constant in duration. Therefore, the impacts are expected to be
negligible, short term, and adverse.
Cumulative Impacts. Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions
that would have effects on soundscapes and noise quality within the park include
the waterline replacement from Munson Springs to Garfield, lagoon project at
Munson Valley, installation of vault toilet and kiosk, trail rehabilitation and
relocation, reconstruction of the Rim parking lot, and rehabilitation of the
superintendent’s house. The effects of these projects would be short term,
adverse, and negligible parkwide. These projects would be very localized and
scheduled during different years. Alternative B would possibly contribute to one
or more of these project as they are scheduled during the same building season.
The impact would be short term, adverse, and negligible.
Conclusion. There would be no change to the long-term soundscapes or noise
environment at the park once construction is completed. There would be a minor
to moderate, very short-term, adverse impact to noise quality along the
wilderness boundary and near the Pacific Crest Trail. There would be a
negligible, very short-term, adverse impact to sensitive receptors—the northern
spotted owl activity center and users of the Annie Creek Canyon Trail. The
cumulative effect of alternative B would be very short term, negligible, and
adverse to the soundscapes or noise environment at the park. There would be very
short-term exceedances of the Noise Abatement Criteria at the Pacific Crest
Trail where it intersects the highway.
Because there would be no major adverse impacts to a resource or value whose
conservation is (1) necessary to fulfill specific purposes identified in the
park’s establishing legislation, (2) key to the natural or cultural integrity of
the park or to opportunities for enjoyment of the park, or (3) identified as a
goal in the park’s General Management Plan or other relevant National Park
Service planning documents, there would be no impairment of park resources or
values.