Crater Lake Institute
 

 Home | Site Map | About Us | Donate/Join Us | Contact Us | CLI Store | Press Room

 
 
 You are here: Home > Online Library > Rehabilitation of Hwy 62 > Impact Topics Selected for Analysis
   

Rehabilitation of Highway 62 West, Crater Lake National Park, Klamath County, Oregon

 

INTRODUCTION

 

<< Previous | Table of Contents | Next >>

ISSUES AND IMPACT TOPICS

Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis

Biotic Communities

NEPA calls for an examination of the impacts on all components of affected ecosystems. National Park Service policy is to protect the components and processes of naturally occurring biotic communities, including the natural abundance, diversity, and ecological integrity of plants and animals (NPS Management Policies 2001a). The proposed action has the potential to affect biotic communities, so this impact topic is addressed in this environmental assessment.

Threatened and Endangered Species and Species of Concern

The Endangered Species Act (1973), as amended, requires an examination of impacts on all federally listed threatened or endangered species. National Park Service policy also requires examination of the impacts on federal candidate species, as well as state-listed threatened, endangered, candidate, rare, declining, and sensitive species. Several consultations have occurred between the National Park Service, Crater Lake National Park, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Basin Field Office.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Basin Field Office, provided updated species lists of federally threatened, endangered and proposed species that may be present on or in the vicinity of Crater Lake National Park (Klamath County). An updated list was received in April 2003 (see appendix 4). Based on the federal species list, there are six listed species and two candidate species that may occur in Klamath County, Oregon. Of these eight species, four species [shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), Oregon spotted frog (Rana pretiosa), and yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus)] occur in habitats not found within the park or have not been observed in presence/absence surveys over the last eight years. A “No Effect” determination has been made for these species.

A meeting among Doug Laye and Leonard LeCaptain of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Basin Field Office, and Mac Brock, Chief, Resource Preservation and Research at Crater Lake National Park was held on 10 April 2003 to discuss the project’s potential effects to the Canada lynx. The park has conducted three years of extensive surveys for Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the park—no lynx have been detected. Within the project area there are patches of old growth stands that contribute to potential lynx habitat. However the patches associated with the project’s road corridor and limited realignment would not be readily used and would probably be avoided by lynx due to the current and continued presence of traffic. Therefore, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service have determined that the project will have no effect on Canada lynx.

Three listed species are known or likely to reside within Crater Lake National Park. The species are:

  • Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucophalus), federal threatened;

  • Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), federal threatened; and

  • Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), federal threatened.

The bald eagle is an occasional resident and may fly over the Highway 62 West corridor but would avoid vehicle and human activity. The bull trout is only located in the Sun and Lost Creeks outside of the project area. Therefore, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service have determined that the project will have no effect on the bald eagle or bull trout. The park determined that the proposed project “may affect” but was “not likely to adversely affect” the northern spotted owl. On 23 August 2002, Crater Lake National Park Superintendent, Charles Lundy, submitted a request for concurrence on the park’s determination and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concurred with that determination (5 September 2002) (see appendix 5).

Threatened and endangered species are addressed as an impact topic in this environmental assessment for the northern spotted owl—all other sensitive species have been dismissed from further discussion.

Soils and Geology

Because the proposed action involves ground-disturbing activities on previously undisturbed soil and further excavation of a quarry, soils and geology are addressed as impact topics in this environmental assessment.

Cultural Resources

The National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 470 et seq.), NEPA, National Park Service Organic Act, NPS Management Policies (2001), Director’s Order – 12: Conservation Planning, Environmental Impact Analysis and Decision-making (2001), and Director’s Order – 28: Cultural Resources Management Guideline require the consideration of impacts on cultural resources either listed in, or eligible to be listed in, the NRHP. Cultural resources include archeological resources, cultural landscapes, historic structures and districts, and ethnographic resources. Although Crater Lake is known primarily as a natural park area, it does have significant cultural resources.

Historic Structures. A rock revetment wall, located in the area of the upper switchback curve, is a contributing structure to the “Wagon Roads in Crater Lake National Park (Western Half)” historic district. The National Park Service recommends and the Oregon SHPO concurred (see Appendix 2), that the historic district is eligible for listing in the NRHP. Therefore, historic structures are addressed under Cultural Resources in this environmental assessment.

Archeological Resources. In the vicinity of the project corridor are historic-period archeological sites, which include sites and isolated finds associated with segments of the Fort Klamath–Jacksonville wagon road. Highway 62 West passes over Whitehorse Creek in the vicinity of historic-period archeological sites. The park archeologist conducted a survey of this area in 2000.

In July and August 2002, a pedestrian survey, conducted by park cultural resource staff, employed 33-feet (10-meter) transect intervals at the proposed switchback realignment, at the Pacific Crest trailhead, the area around turnout B, and at the turnout to the west of Whitehorse Crossing. Meandering transects along each side of Highway 62 at Whitehorse Creek and the Old West Entrance were also employed. A portion of a 1911 road alignment was discovered roughly parallel Highway 62, east of the modern road in the switchback area.

As proposed in the preliminary design, the realignment of the switchbacks in the preferred alternative (alternative C) would avoid historic-period archeological resources, including the 1911 road, resulting in no impact to archeological resources in the switchback area. In other areas surveyed, all artifacts and features lie beyond the area of potential effect. A report documenting the results of the pedestrian survey, together with an assessment of actions having an effect on cultural resources, was submitted to the Oregon SHPO on 9 September 2002.

The National Park Service would use archeological monitors, as necessary, in the project area to avoid disturbance of any as yet unknown cultural resources. Because archeological resources would be avoided through highway design, no impacts to archeological resources are anticipated. However, due to the proximity to known archeological resources, this topic is addressed under the Cultural Resources heading in this environmental assessment.

Visitor Use, Traffic, and Highway Safety

An estimated 445,000 people visited the park area in 2001. The proposed project is a major access route to the lake and is needed to improve driving conditions. All alternatives in this document have the potential to impact visitor use, traffic, and highway safety. Therefore, visitor use, traffic, and highway safety are addressed as impact topics in this environmental assessment.

Park Operations

Crater Lake National Park receives an average of 522 inches of snow each winter. Although the proposed project would not diminish the need for or level of snow removal, it would improve snow removal operations. The roadway is prone to potholing and a new road surface would minimize maintenance and repairs. Therefore, these activities under park operations are addressed as an impact topic in this environmental assessment.

Air Quality

The 1963 Clean Air Act, as amended (42 USC 7401 et seq.), requires federal land managers to protect park air quality, while the 2001 NPS Management Policies address the need to analyze air quality during park planning. Crater Lake National Park was designated Class I under the 1963 Clean Air Act, as amended. A Class I area is subject to the most stringent regulations of any designation.

Should any of the action alternatives be selected, local air quality would be temporarily affected by dust and vehicle emissions. Therefore, air quality is addressed as an impact topic.

Noise and Soundscapes

In accordance with NPS Management Policies (2001) and Director’s Order – 47: Sound Preservation and Noise Management, an important part of the National Park Service mission is preservation of natural soundscapes associated with national park units. Natural soundscapes exist in the absence of human-caused sound. The natural ambient soundscape is the aggregate of all the natural sounds that occur in park units, together with the physical capacity for transmitting natural sounds. The frequencies, magnitudes, and duration of human-caused sound considered acceptable varies among National Park Service units, as well as potentially throughout each park unit, being generally greater in developed areas and less in undeveloped areas.

Construction projects would be accomplished under the implementation of either alternative B or C. Equipment and vehicles involved in hauling, construction activities, and removal of existing switchbacks (alternative C) would generate the primary source of noise. Therefore, soundscapes and noise are addressed as an impact topic in this environmental assessment.

 

 

 

 Site Navigation

  Arts

  Crater Lake News

  Cultural History

  Natural History

  Online Library

     Articles

     Books

        Browse all by Author

        Browse all by Title

        Cultural History

           General

           Historic Structures

           Native American

           Oral Histories

        Natural History

           Flora and Fauna

           General

        Park Management

           General

           Planning

        Research

           Atmosphere

           Fauna

           Fire

           Flora

           General

           Geology

           Limnology

           Visitation

     Nature Notes

     Images

     Maps

  Planning a Visit

  Research