
Even a cursory glance at the landscape
reveals that vegetation is not distributed at random, but occurs in
mosaics as an expression of several interacting variables. The whitebark
pine (Pinus albicaulis,
meaning white-stemmed pine) is a tree found at Crater Lake National Park
generally above 6500 feet on exposed slopes in dry, rocky soils. This
tree is easily identified by its whitish-gray bark and often twisted
branches. Although Crater Lake National Park has no true timberline,
whitebark pine forms the elfinwood or krummholz of timberline in many
western mountain ranges.
Whitebark pine is a pioneer species
colonizing subalpine habitats as the first tree. An amazing example of
its pioneering ability can be seen at the Newberry caldera where
whitebark pine is the only tree established upon the relatively recent
obsidian surface; even the nearby lodgepole pines (P. contorta, subsp.
murrayana) abruptly end near the toe of the flow. At the Crater Lake
caldera, whitebark pine may have been the first tree to colonize the
pumice slopes of old Mount Mazama within the first century following the
climactic eruption. Whitebark pine is generally encountered as a pioneer
tree, as there are several places around the caldera rim where old
mother trees provided a favorable microclimate for the establishment
beneath their canopy of subalpine fir
(Abies lasiocarpa) or mountain hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana).
Whitebark pine is arranged in ribbons or bands along the contours of
Cloudcap and other habitats along the caldera's edge. These sites
represent slightly higher, rocky substrate for the survival of whitebark
seedlings since exposed areas devoid of snow earlier in the year have a
significantly longer growing season.
Most pine seeds have wings for wind
dispersal, but whitebark seeds have retained only a rudimentary wing.
The dispersal agent has become the Clark's Nutcracker (Nucifraga
columbiana). These birds have learned to retrieve whitebark seeds
with their specialized beaks, storinga number in their sublingual pouch,
and methodically storing seeds in soil caches. Only a fraction of the
seed caches are retrieved, however, so some caches sprout seedlings in
clumps which may grow into larger whitebark pine colonies.
Whitebark pine appears to be sensitive
to a certain set of environmental conditions. Although it is often
viewed only as an indicator of a short "rowing season and cold
temperatures, this species occupies a niche in the subalpine forest that
is far from simple. The tree can be found in relatively pure stands or
in association with lodgepole pine and western white pine (P.
monticola). The distribution of related species like limber pine
(P.flexilis),
bristlecone pine (P. longaeva), and foxtail pine (P.
balfouriana) somewhat overlap that of the whitebark and can occupy
what would often seem to be the latter's place forming the edge of
timberline. Whitebark pine's distribution poses some nagging questions
to dendrologists. For example, it provides the name for Nevada's Pine
Forest Range but mysteriously remains absent in similar subalpine
habitats on Steens Mountain in southeastern Oregon, only several air
miles to the north. In southern Oregon, the whitebark pine may have
disappeared on Mount Ashland in recent times and is presently almost
gone from the top of Crater Lake's Wizard Island.
One of the reasons that whitebark and
other pines are often so puzzling is that species of Pinus display much
variation as well as many similarities. For example, whitebark pine and
limber pine (the rarest native coniferous species in Oregon, but more
common in the Great Basin and northern Rockies) mimic each other in many
characters. Similarly, the ponderosa pine (P.) found along Annie
and Sun creeks, for instance, display a strong Washoe pine (P.
washoensis) element. This is thought to be a high elevation variant
of the ponderosa's northwestern distribution and may account for its
presence at higher elevations inside the caldera. Genetic variability in
the park's whitebark pine may not be as great as in the ponderosa
forests, but the loss of a population as small as the one on Wizard
Island may imperil a distinct local seed source.
What is disturbing about the whitebark
pine of Wizard Island is their seemingly rapid decline. Photographs
taken at various times through the 1960s show living trees on top of the
island. By July 1991, however, the authors could find only one living
specimen. This small population's relatively sudden nosedive may be due
to one or several causes. Might it be human activity, air pollution,
drought, mountain pine beetle, or blister rust infection? The
whitebark's decline is more likely tied to a combination of these
factors, which makes the testing of single hypotheses (a key to the
application of scientific method to the problem) very difficult or, at
best, inconclusive.
Efforts aimed at monitoring
environmental change in national parks like Crater Lake are generally
handicapped by the lack of critical baseline information. Material
available to the historian may help to reconstruct past conditions, but
investigators should be aware of their possible shortcomings. The
documentary record is limited to the historic period, whether it is in
the form of photographs or writings.
Repeat photography is constrained by
the scale and resolution of the original photo, as well as by the
identifiable background features that allow a view to be replicated.
Observations about the condition of flora throughout the park are
usually fragmentary. Some describe what would seem to be unlikely
events, even though the journalist may otherwise be credible. One
example is a newspaper article of 1903 where Klamath Falls hotelier and
photographer Maud Baldwin noted that Wizard Island was '"alive with
grasshoppers. " Sufficient detail or locality data to verify an
observation can be a problem, too. Much effort was expended by Crater
Lake's chief park naturalist in the 1960s trying to track clown a
colleague's discovery of the prostrate juniper (Juniperus communis)
specimen probably living near the Watchman in 1929.
Other changes that might have occurred
during the historic period lack any form of documentation. Just one of
many examples in the park is the poor condition of Sun Meadow's
vegetation when compared to the floral mosaic of Sun Notch. Simplistic
explanations, such as sheep grazing prior to the park's establishment or
a poor soil nutrient budget, are often offered by park staff when the
limitations of available evidence or funding seem to frustrate efforts
to study the situation further.
What the whitebark's disappearance on
Wizard Island may illustrate, as have the attempts to understand
fluctuations in Crater Lake's clarity, is that we really under stand
very little about the park's ecosystems. Certainly more research is
essential, but the limitations of available data have to be accepted
since causation may be due to a number of factors not easily separable
into testable hypotheses. Instead of certainty, all history and science
can yield is a prediction of possibilities if the limitations affecting
available evidence can be overcome through sound methodology.
Explanations based on models of
complexity rather than simplicity will have to be complemented, however,
by a willingness to admit that sometimes we do not have all the answers.
Since whitebark pine ring the summit crater which provides the lake's
name, what better symbol of uncertainty could there be for a phenomenon
as complex as Crater Lake?
