Crater Lake Institute
 

 Home | Site Map | About Us | Donate/Join Us | Contact Us | CLI Store | Press Room

 
 
 You are here: Home > Online Library > Volcano and Earthquake Hazards... > Potential Size and Flow Velocity
   

Volcano and Earthquake Hazards in the Crater Lake Region, Oregon

 

Hazards of Lahars (Volcanic Debris Flows) and Their Runout Flows

 

<< Previous | Table of Contents | Next >>

Potential Size and Flow Velocity of Lahars at Crater Lake

We can make an educated guess of the size and properties of potential lahars at Crater Lake by analogy with documented events at other volcanoes. The analysis presented in table 1 is based on a 1982 lahar at Mount St. Helens (Scott, 1988) and several lahars from Ruapehu Volcano, New Zealand (Nairn and others, 1979; Ruapehu Surveillance Group, 1996; S.J. Cronin, written commun., 1996).

Ruapehu is an andesite composite volcano with a crater 0.5 km in diameter. A 9x106 m3 (cubic meters) lake (also called Crater Lake) occupied the active vent at 2,540 m altitude prior to 1995. Numerous past eruptions have catastrophically displaced lake water, which probably transformed to debris flows and their hyperconcentrated runouts. At least 1.6x106 m3 of water and lake deposits were ejected by hydromagmatic explosions in a 1975 eruption, resulting in an 8 m fall in lake level (Nairn and others, 1979).


Learn more about the Geology of Crater Lake National Park through articles, books, images, news, and more


Recorded discharges in downstream drainages reached 5,000 m3/s and flow velocities as high as 12 m/s were estimated (Nairn and others, 1979). Estimated flow volume indicated substantial bulking of the flow. From data for the 1953, 1975, and 1995 flows at Ruapehu Volcano and the 1982 flow at Mount St. Helens, we can synthesize the dynamics and behavior of a flow appropriate for planning and design purposes at Crater Lake (table 1). The greater size of Crater Lake, Oregon, (~9 km, Oregon, vs. 0.5 km diameter, New Zealand) may represent a greater hazard, but more probably the greater volume and depth would absorb a significant part of the energy of an explosive event. There should be ample warning to prepare for noncohesive lahars because any plausible scenario for their generation at Crater Lake is linked to renewed volcanic activity that should be preceded by detectable seismicity.

 

 

 

 

 Site Navigation

  Arts

  Crater Lake News

  Cultural History

  Natural History

  Online Library

     Articles

     Books

        Browse all by Author

        Browse all by Title

        Cultural History

           General

           Historic Structures

           Native American

           Oral Histories

        Natural History

           Flora and Fauna

           General

        Park Management

           General

           Planning

        Research

           Atmosphere

           Fauna

           Fire

           Flora

           General

           Geology

           Limnology

           Visitation

     Nature Notes

     Images

     Maps

  Planning a Visit

  Research